QA Inc.
QUALITYAMERICA.COM we're worth your visit!
QP Inc.

Quality America Weblog

Weblog Home
Weblog Archives
QA Knowledge Center
Ask the Expert

Quality America Home
Training & Consulting
SPC Explorer RT
SPC IV Excel
Green Belt XL
QPulse

Valid XHTML 1.0!

Powered By Greymatter

Home » Archives » May 2008 » Sample Size Considerations

[Previous entry: "Fitting Non-Normal Curves to Data"] [Next entry: "OEE Calculations"]

05/28/2008: "Sample Size Considerations"


How do you choose a sample size? is there a definite number or does it always depend on the population (# of parts being manufactured)?
In the real world, my boss always told me to get at least 30 pieces, and his reasoning was because it makes statistical sense. I think the reasoning doesn't have much weight. However, it seems that everywhere I worked the magic number is 30
Freddy B., Quality Assurance Engineer III

When you work with populations, such as in drawing samples from a homogenous lot to make decisions about lot acceptability, the sample size is determined with consideration to the power of the sample. Generally, you will have greater power to distinguish the deviation of the lot from the acceptability standards when:


  • there is a large difference between the lot mean and the acceptability standard;

  • the standard deviation of the population is small;

  • the sample is large;

  • the significance of the test is large. In other words, all else being equal, the power to detect a difference is better when you don't care if you make a false assertion.


You can calculate the sample size to detect a given difference at given significance (alpha) and power using statistical algorithms such as found at http://www.stat.ubc.ca/~rollin/stats/ssize/n2.html.
This topic is covered in more detail in our Black Belt course, as well as the Six Sigma Demystified and Six Sigma Handbook texts.
For process data, where control charts are the optimal tool, the subgroup size is determined with consideration to Rational Subgrouping concerns. (See Rational Subgroups). The number of subgroups necessary to properly define the control limits is based on the process dynamics, as well as statistical concerns. Statistically, thirty subgroups provide a reasonable estimate of process variation when a subgroup size of 5 is used, but more subgroups are needed for smaller subgroup sizes. As a rule of thumb, I generally suggest 150 -200 observations, grouped in rational subgroups of size one to five. See also: Defining Control Limits.

pak



 

Search | Site Map | Privacy | About Us

Copyright © 1995-2008 Quality America Inc. All Rights Reserved