|
Contents
| Quality Encyclopedia
| Discussion Blogs
Key
Success Factors for the Implementation of SPC
Jiju
Antony and Ben Mason
School
of Engineering, University of Warwick, UK
E-mail:
Jiju.Antony@warwick.ac.uk
Mr Tolga
Taner
Boaziçi
University
Institute
of Biomedical Engineering
Bebek
80015, Istanbul, Turkey
Today’s
consumer markets experience an ever-increasing demand for high quality
products and services at low costs. It is therefore logical that if a
company wishes to be competitive in today’s modern market place, one of
its main aims should be to focus upon producing products/processes of
a consistently high quality. Total Quality Management (TQM) is a broad
management philosophy used within the organizations with the aim of promoting
a culture and attitude of continuous improvement of product/service quality.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a technique used within the TQM framework
for reducing variation in processes which we deal with everyday. It is
a powerful technique to control, manage, analyze and improve the performance
of a process by eliminating special causes of variation in processes such
as tool wear, operator error, errors in measurements, use of improper
raw material, and so on [1].
In the
western world, the general consensus is that techniques like SPC should
be implemented for customer satisfaction rather than part of a strategic
plan by the company. The full benefits of SPC tend to be realized only
when the motivation is appropriate. According to Brannstrom-Stenberg
& Deleryd,
"Organisations
that have implemented statistical process control of their own free will
experience advantages to a greater extent"
[2]. In Japan, many companies have embraced the technique
SPC with great success for tackling quality related problems such as high
scrap rate, increased number of customer complaints, high rework costs,
incapable processes etc. SPC has not proved to be similarly successful
in the West due to various reasons. Some noticeable reasons are:
-
Lack
of commitment from senior management
-
Lack
of training and education in SPC
-
Lack
of awareness of the potential benefits of SPC
-
Lack
of knowledge on what to measure and how to measure in a certain
process
-
Inadequate
measurement system in place
-
Lack
of knowledge to prioritize processes
-
Misinterpretation
of control charts
-
Negative
reaction of operators and middle managers
-
Resistance
to change, and so on.
In
order to effectively apply SPC in any organization, it is fundamental
to understand the essential ingredients that will make the application
of SPC successful. These ingredients are:
Management
issues – total management support and commitment, necessary resources
for training and education + follow-up of training from time to time,
actions on the system/processes whenever needed
Engineering
skills – understanding the key benefits from the introduction and application
of SPC, measurement system analysis (stability, capability, linearity
etc.), process prioritization, understanding what key characteristics
or process parameters to measure and how to measure them, etc.
Statistical
skills – statistical stability, calculation of control limits, interpretation
of control limits, selection of control charts, determination of sample
size & sub-group size, etc.
Teamwork
skills – company-wide understanding of SPC and its benefits, co-operation
from all levels of the organization, brainstorm what needs to measure
in a process and so on.
Statistical
Education for Engineering Students in the UK
Perhaps
the training and education towards SPC implementation should be taught
at an earlier stage and on a wider front in the education system, especially
to engineering students in higher education. Currently, within engineering
institutions very little time is spent on management and implementation
aspects of SPC. The main focus seems to be on control charting of various
processes. According to Xie and Goh " Too often Organizations look
at the ‘control chart’ as the only approach to handle issues – and this
will not work" [3]. Very few engineers graduating today from the
UK higher education institutions are exposed to powerful problem solving
techniques such as SPC, Design of Experiments (DOE) and Taguchi methods
[Antony et al., 1999].
The
first two authors are currently developing a useful and practical framework
for the implementation of SPC that will assist industrial engineers with
limited skills and knowledge in SPC. The conceptual framework will consider
the ingredients, which are essential for the success of SPC initiatives
in organizations. The framework will take the form of a systematic methodology
for the effective implementation of SPC in any industrial setting.
References
[1]. Ben Mason
and Jiju Antony, " Is SPC Just about Control Charts", Unpublished
work.
[2].
Brannstorm-Stenberg and Deleryd, " Implementation of Statistical
Process Control and Process Capability Studies: Requirements or Free will?",
TQM Journal, July 1999.
[3].
Xie and Goh, " Statistical Techniques for Quality", The TQM
Magazine, 1999.
[4].
Antony, J et al., " Experimental Quality – A Strategic Approach to
Achieve and Improve Quality", Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
|